WHY WE SHOULD SEND A MANNED MISSION TO MARS
Nowadays
the topic discussion is if it possible to live in Mars in the future because
scientists will demonstrate that Mars have qualities similar to our planet or
it is possible to find new kind of life that helps us to improve our technology.
Also the potential countries like U.S,
China, Russia and European union are interested in spend and take risk to send
a special mission to Mars in order to have evidences to prove their theories.
Although some people think that that it is worth the expense and risk to make a
manned flight to Mars, I believe that it is very expensive and difficult to do
it.
Many
researchers said that Mars is a planet that bring us value information to
understand the origin of life and
manners to improve the environmental problems on our planet(“Joulwan”).However
they are only theories because at the moment scientists don’t have real
evidences that demonstrate that Mars has this characteristics because they use robots , but they don’t do a
lot as the human. According to Dava Newman a professor of aeronautics at the
Massachusetts Institute of technology said that it is very risk and expensive
to send mission to Mars and it is difficult that so much persons can explore because
they don´t possibilities to do it.
The
European Agency (ESA) has a performance plans that consist in use robots to
explore the planetary in order to discover habitation that has best technology
and new kind of life. Also this plan calls Aurora that will finish with exploration
in Mars in the 2030s(“Joulwan”).However don’t want to wait much time to get
information about it because we prefer obtains faster solutions to help our
planet to reduce the problems and preserve the Earth.
The
final argument by opponent is that Mars is a good alternative to leave in the
future (“Vasquez,p. 198”).However, They can explain and demonstrate how to
repopulate humans in this planet with certain example and after prove that Mars
has benefits to leave . In addition they can offer that our generation can
preserve in the future because it is very costly and we don´t have the equipment
and technology necessaries to realize it.
In
conclusion, It should be evident that the arguments to send flight mission to Mars
are no valid. On the contrary, many
people need to be conscious to protect our planet and find a solution to help
and improve the Earth. Also science and technology should use to improve the
ways solve the problems on our planet in order to have a good world and live
more years in the Earth.
-Adapted from Joulwan, Melissa. “you decide:
Manned Mission to Mars.” 13 May 2004 KQED 13 May 2004. 10June2004http://www.kqed.org\topics\news\perspectives\youdecide\pop\mars\index.jsp?flash=true>
-Carlos Emilio Vasquez Urday “ECO science , technology and enviroment
MARITE BERTHA MARIN LINDO-A09
well, i really liked your essay Marite, because your points of view are so clear and well-supported. First, i notice that your essay is is correctly formatted and there is no grammar mistakes or spelling errors. That's great. Then about the content and organization, it is obvious that your work has three parts which are the introduction, the body and the conlusion and they help the readers to get and understand the idea so well.
ReplyDeleteYou gave three arguments and rebut them with real information from different authors and they are cited at the end of your essay,that is a good thing so you will avoid plagiarism. For last your conclusion restation your opinion and some suggestions. I am Milagros - A09
Your essay has an introduction, a body and a conclution. You use a point-by-point organization. You use some quotations, and your ideas are clear and well supported. It is a convinsig essay; however, your tittle is "why we shuld send a manned mision to mars", and you think that we shouldn´t send a mission, so it is a little confusing. Still, I really like your essay.
ReplyDeleteI liked your essay because it is well organized. You used a point by point organization. You arguments are: First,There are only theories that studying Mars we can know more about our planet. The other point is that it would be better if we start findind solutions for the problems of our planet. The final argument is that it would be very costly to live in Maes in the future. In contrast the opponents arguments are: They say that studying Mars we may know more about our planet. The other is that they believe that maube in Mars we can find new kind of technology and life. Finally, they claim that Mars could be a good alternative to live in the future.
ReplyDeleteWell, I found your essay very convicing because of the quotations and facts. However, it could be a good idea if you consider your point of view in your conclusion. I liked your essay a lot, it was really nice
Hey Marite, consider revising your essay for some omissions in grammar, use of words, and spelling.
ReplyDelete